Anyway, here are the pictures, if anyone wants to see some photos of any of them from the inside or any of the ones I have mentioned that you can't spot in the photos, let me know and I'll upload them. I might do a post anyway with some of my favourites and/or the ones I have multiple copies of to show the differences between the years or productions.
Musicals and plays reviews
Blog containing my reviews/comments of plays, musicals, in London's West End and regional productions
Saturday, 21 October 2017
Programmes Collection
I was making a new cover photo for Twitter and something else (I have used part of it on here!) and used lots of my collection of programmes for it. I thought I would post the full picture on here as some people do like looking at old programme covers etc. This isn't all of my collection, I have some shows that I didn't put in such as Starlight Express, High School Musical and more comedians. I also have seen lots of shows multiple times so for example I have Chicago from the West End and then one for Manchester and one for Stoke, I have about five Grease ones and different versions of the Rat Pack and Blues Brothers. The only three shows I can think of that I don't have a programme for that I have seen are Mamma Mia, no idea how this happened, and then In the Heights as we saw it the night before the cast change and they didn't have any of the "old" programmes left and Journey's End as they didn't have any. There are obviously some missing from when I was a kid and I wasn't bothered about buying them and my parents didn't get one, shows like Boogie Nights I saw when I was about 7.
Anyway, here are the pictures, if anyone wants to see some photos of any of them from the inside or any of the ones I have mentioned that you can't spot in the photos, let me know and I'll upload them. I might do a post anyway with some of my favourites and/or the ones I have multiple copies of to show the differences between the years or productions.
Anyway, here are the pictures, if anyone wants to see some photos of any of them from the inside or any of the ones I have mentioned that you can't spot in the photos, let me know and I'll upload them. I might do a post anyway with some of my favourites and/or the ones I have multiple copies of to show the differences between the years or productions.
Monday, 3 July 2017
Merry Christmas Maggie Thatcher Billy Elliot UK Tour
Hey everyone,
I wrote most of this whilst on trains travelling back
from uni as at the moment I rarely have any other time to do anything other
than uni work or I’m doing shifts at my jobs and voluntary work, so I apologise for any errors or mistakes in this one, I just wanted to post something. So, please enjoy and do let me know if you have seen
any of the other "tour Billys" and tell me what their performance was like! I thought I'd post it now as the production has gone to Hamburg and is out of the UK now which is sad.
I saw Billy Elliot the UK Tour production on Saturday 10th
December 2016 at 2:30pm at the Palace Theatre in Manchester. We had no
understudies I believe. When I’m talking about we in this one I’m talking about
myself and my younger sister who is 14 and a big dancer so this is one of her
favourite musicals alongside Wicked, she also hates Thatcher like I do (we have a lot of ex-miners in our family!)! We sat
about 6 rows from the front in the stalls pretty much dead centre. For this one I think
I’ll just talk mostly about the cast and the differences to the London production and
how I felt they were as I did the rest in more detail in my last post.
We actually felt that this production was better than the
version we saw in London a few years ago and we both enjoyed it more. I don’t
know if this was because of the cast, the music or just that the production
felt fresher because the team had finally had a proper chance to make
substantial changes after finishing in London after such a long time. I
read/watched other people’s blog and reviews about the production and people
who seem to have loved it in London don’t seem to like lots of the changes, I am not sure why, maybe because lots of them went regularly so got used
to it being a certain way. I did love it in London, but overall I felt this
production was a bit slicker and more energetic overall, I also really liked some of the new musical arrangements and this version of 'Angry Dance' which I'll talk more about later.
It was a matinee which from our experiences I find that sometimes the audience are not as energetic or as excited or wanting
to get involved as much which sadly we did feel here a bit, but it didn’t really affect
the show too much, only really when Tony talks to the audience a bit or the
songs where you sort of automatically begin clapping along or often have a big
audience response at the end like ‘Merry Christmas Maggie Thatcher’ or
‘Expressing Yourself’. However, the applause was always there at the right times and there was lots of it. We did have some annoying audience members around us (I am aiming to do a post on theatre etiquette as people on the Musical Theatre Appreciation Society FB and Twitter group I'm part of are discussing it a lot at the moment as there seem to be increasing problems!) mostly people with sweet wrappers, making noises with them all the way through. ATG seem to be increasing the amount of sweets they sell (they also do that order and it is bought to your seat service now) and are allowing more alcohol to be sold and bought into the auditorium which is a shame as it annoys people around them a lot. We managed to not get annoyed at them but it is irritating when you pay so much money to see a show and people can be so inconsiderate of others.
I’ll start with the cast as I know people like to know about
that. The young man who played Billy for us was Emile Gooding and as I
understand it was the newest Billy to the team, but you could not tell at all.
He was brilliant, our London Billy Ollie was great, but Emile was I felt just a
bit more of a polished performer. You could not fault his ‘Electricity’ which
was a ballet version, he was bang on with the music, he used facial expressions
and all of his moves were very clean. I checked this with my sister as she has
done high level ballet grades etc. and she said that his ballet was much
cleaner than lots of the other Billy’s we have watched online. Sometimes the
ballet Billy’s seem to struggle with the acro parts of the show, but again,
Emile was spot on. I know the Billys are cast based mostly on their dancing skills, but Emile
hit all of the notes and was a fine singer. His acting was good too, his comic
timing was the best I’ve seen but I think his forte was the emotional scenes,
he was brilliant with Grandma. Well Done Emile! In case you didn't spot him or didn't see it, he appeared on Little Big Shots UK, check him out: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZBZlEYBAPJU
Henry Farmer played Michael, and again he was brilliant. He was easily on par with Zach who we saw in London (who was Michael in the filmed version) and as required from Michael, his comic timing was amazing. He made the song ‘Expressing Yourself’ with his facial expressions alone never mind the boy’s tap dancing! Again, he had a good singing voice too, but it felt like he is destined to be some kind of comedy actor! We had Lily Cadwallender as our Debbie and her acting was spot on. She played the part very much like we saw in London so along with the other ballet girls were very funny. The young lady who played Susan Parks was particularly good, if you’ve seen the show or listened to the soundtrack you know that along with Tracy, Susan is one of the more prominent ballet girls and comic ones, but the young lady that played her, her comic timing was spot on! My favourite bit with the ballet girls is in ‘Shine’ when they are told to smile, I love it as all girls look like they are having a great time pulling funny faces and I’ve seen that kind of smile happen it real life a number of times watching my younger sister’s shows!
Henry Farmer played Michael, and again he was brilliant. He was easily on par with Zach who we saw in London (who was Michael in the filmed version) and as required from Michael, his comic timing was amazing. He made the song ‘Expressing Yourself’ with his facial expressions alone never mind the boy’s tap dancing! Again, he had a good singing voice too, but it felt like he is destined to be some kind of comedy actor! We had Lily Cadwallender as our Debbie and her acting was spot on. She played the part very much like we saw in London so along with the other ballet girls were very funny. The young lady who played Susan Parks was particularly good, if you’ve seen the show or listened to the soundtrack you know that along with Tracy, Susan is one of the more prominent ballet girls and comic ones, but the young lady that played her, her comic timing was spot on! My favourite bit with the ballet girls is in ‘Shine’ when they are told to smile, I love it as all girls look like they are having a great time pulling funny faces and I’ve seen that kind of smile happen it real life a number of times watching my younger sister’s shows!
Onto the adult cast, I know a few people have moaned about
how Dad is played, but again this is usually by people who went to see the
London production regularly and got used to it being played by Deka Walmsley because he
was there for so long. However, I felt that Martin Walsh who played Dad in
Manchester was just as good. I don’t know if they react differently to the end
of ‘Electricity’ every show or so as it was the same as what happens on the
DVD, however, when I saw it in London Dekka did something else and I’ve seen a
few other Dad’s online that react the same. I don’t know if they save that
reaction for so many shows or something so I won’t spoil it, but if you’ve seen
the show and it was different to what Dekka did on the DVD then you know what
I’m talking about and I do prefer that reaction compared to the one of him just
being in shock at the end which is on the DVD and what happened in Manchester.
Tony was played by Scott Garnham and again, I feel he played
the part well. I think I preferred the Tony we had in London, simply because he
showed was a bit better with the comic moments, especially when interacting
with the audience at the start of the 2nd half, but it is difficult
to compare that bit really as they changed it a lot from the London production,
it was much shorter, none of the jokes directed at particular groups in the
audience, so he did well with the script he was given. I saw Scott years ago in Les Mis, so it was nice to see him again and his acting skills, especially in the emotional moments were excellent. Mrs Wilkinson was played
by Annette McLaughlin and was as good as the lady we saw in London and Ruthie
on the DVD. I liked her interaction with the ballet girls a lot so it made the
comedy scenes really fun to watch. The boxing coach and Mr Braithway were funny
as usual, but after seeing David as Mr Braithway, there was a lot to live up to
and personally I preferred David’s portrayal as he interacted with the audience
better, which may have been easier in London thinking about it as the audience
were quite far from the stage in Manchester compared to in London. Grandma was played
by Andrea Miller was as funny and moving as ever, I mean, I saw Ann Emery in London who has now sadly passed
away and she had played Grandma for so long it must be difficult for other
actresses to pick up the part, she is also on the Billy live DVD. Our Manchester was probably a better singer and
dancer, but Anne just had that perfect comic timing and connection with the
audience, it would be hard to beat. The ensemble were very good, very funny when needed and the power of their voices in the emotional songs was amazing, I love the beginning song when they sing 'all out til we've won', it really shows how communities stood together.
Onto some of the changes, little things were changed such as it was a mother rather than father for the 'posh' child at the Royal Ballet School audition, which didn't really make a difference and as mentioned above, the start of the 2nd act with Tony was slightly different with less jokes aimed at the audience. The audition scene was completely different and this is one scene where I preferred the London version as lots of comedic moments were lost such as when the tape is going wrong. I think it was shorter overall so it was probably to save time. The set was therefore different too for this bit, the other bit we noticed was during in 'Express' it was more like the US version and versions I've seen in other countries as they had a rainbow shiny background at one point, which was nice. Obviously they had to make some set changes due to it being on tour, so the opening set was different I think and they couldn't have the set appearing and disappearing out of the floor like the kitchen and Billy's bedroom. The biggest change was 'Angry Dance' and we really liked it. The music felt more upbeat some how and more powerful (the score appeared to have changed in other parts as well, but I liked it and nothing was too dramatically changed for it to have a massive impact). The choreography for 'Angry Dance' was the biggest change, for example, more of the start was performed in Billy's bedroom than on the stage floor and they used boards to create a big British Coal sign with images of the strike projected onto it, and an audio of Thatcher playing over the top of the music. I really liked this bit and it gave me goosebumps, as it made you think about how awful this situation was. It was basically the US version I think that I have seen clips of on youtube e.g. the one that was performed at the Tony Awards: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k7GcqFmFAE8 I like this version but the bit I missed was where Billy has ballet shoes tied together and swings them around his head, I don't know why I just like that part so it was a shame that was no longer in it! The two versions are pretty different so people will have different preferences but I felt the tour one was just a bit more powerful and moving.
All of the other dances were pretty much the same I think, very slick and choreographed brilliantly. As I mentioned we had a ballet Billy, but there was lots of acro skills in it which were brilliant to see live.
Regrading the sets, as I said they obviously couldn't do some things but it was mostly just the set coming out of the floor like the bedroom. Other than that it is quite a plain set which fits in with the mood and it does not need really fancy sets for it to work. I still like the staging of when the miners are supposed to be going underground which is helped with the sound affects and lighting. Speaking of them, both were very slick and as I remember we actually had no technical issues. Sorry to say I didn't pay much attention to the lighting in this one which is something I am hoping to pay attention to more in the future, alongside how sets work etc. as I re-watch shows I have seen before so can focus more on them rather than just the story or acting. The costumes were pretty much the same too and the make-up. The best part are the big dancing dresses as the rest of the musical does not really call for big fancy costumes. All looked authentic though and fit in well with the mood of the show, especially with Michael's standing out more than others. The props were spot on again too, all looking authentic and there were no issues. We noticed some of the props for the letter scene that Billy brings to his lesson were different which was an interesting change, one we are not sure why was done, but it didn't really cause any issues. Well done to the technical team and the orchestra who sounded amazing as always!
Overall we really enjoyed the show, I usually don't prefer the tour versions compared to the West End version but this was an exception. You could tell they had been able to make changes that they wanted to to make it a bit fresher but kept all of the key moments and perfected the dances which everybody wanted to see. It was Christmas time too which made it extra special and the Merry Christmas song worked perfectly! Hopefully we shall see Billy return to the UK in the near future and I am sure we will see lots of the young cast members in the future. If you are in or can get to Hamburg, go see it quick! http://billyelliotthemusical.com/
Onto some of the changes, little things were changed such as it was a mother rather than father for the 'posh' child at the Royal Ballet School audition, which didn't really make a difference and as mentioned above, the start of the 2nd act with Tony was slightly different with less jokes aimed at the audience. The audition scene was completely different and this is one scene where I preferred the London version as lots of comedic moments were lost such as when the tape is going wrong. I think it was shorter overall so it was probably to save time. The set was therefore different too for this bit, the other bit we noticed was during in 'Express' it was more like the US version and versions I've seen in other countries as they had a rainbow shiny background at one point, which was nice. Obviously they had to make some set changes due to it being on tour, so the opening set was different I think and they couldn't have the set appearing and disappearing out of the floor like the kitchen and Billy's bedroom. The biggest change was 'Angry Dance' and we really liked it. The music felt more upbeat some how and more powerful (the score appeared to have changed in other parts as well, but I liked it and nothing was too dramatically changed for it to have a massive impact). The choreography for 'Angry Dance' was the biggest change, for example, more of the start was performed in Billy's bedroom than on the stage floor and they used boards to create a big British Coal sign with images of the strike projected onto it, and an audio of Thatcher playing over the top of the music. I really liked this bit and it gave me goosebumps, as it made you think about how awful this situation was. It was basically the US version I think that I have seen clips of on youtube e.g. the one that was performed at the Tony Awards: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k7GcqFmFAE8 I like this version but the bit I missed was where Billy has ballet shoes tied together and swings them around his head, I don't know why I just like that part so it was a shame that was no longer in it! The two versions are pretty different so people will have different preferences but I felt the tour one was just a bit more powerful and moving.
All of the other dances were pretty much the same I think, very slick and choreographed brilliantly. As I mentioned we had a ballet Billy, but there was lots of acro skills in it which were brilliant to see live.
Regrading the sets, as I said they obviously couldn't do some things but it was mostly just the set coming out of the floor like the bedroom. Other than that it is quite a plain set which fits in with the mood and it does not need really fancy sets for it to work. I still like the staging of when the miners are supposed to be going underground which is helped with the sound affects and lighting. Speaking of them, both were very slick and as I remember we actually had no technical issues. Sorry to say I didn't pay much attention to the lighting in this one which is something I am hoping to pay attention to more in the future, alongside how sets work etc. as I re-watch shows I have seen before so can focus more on them rather than just the story or acting. The costumes were pretty much the same too and the make-up. The best part are the big dancing dresses as the rest of the musical does not really call for big fancy costumes. All looked authentic though and fit in well with the mood of the show, especially with Michael's standing out more than others. The props were spot on again too, all looking authentic and there were no issues. We noticed some of the props for the letter scene that Billy brings to his lesson were different which was an interesting change, one we are not sure why was done, but it didn't really cause any issues. Well done to the technical team and the orchestra who sounded amazing as always!
Overall we really enjoyed the show, I usually don't prefer the tour versions compared to the West End version but this was an exception. You could tell they had been able to make changes that they wanted to to make it a bit fresher but kept all of the key moments and perfected the dances which everybody wanted to see. It was Christmas time too which made it extra special and the Merry Christmas song worked perfectly! Hopefully we shall see Billy return to the UK in the near future and I am sure we will see lots of the young cast members in the future. If you are in or can get to Hamburg, go see it quick! http://billyelliotthemusical.com/
Saturday, 18 February 2017
Show list
Hey everyone,
Sorry for the wait, moving twice in one year and two new jobs was getting a bit overwhelming, but my Billy Elliot UK Tour post is very nearly done.
2018 was a very mixed year, my top three shows were the League of Gentlemen Tour, Hamilton and Everybody is Talking About Jamie, reviews of all shall be up soon now that I have moved again and started my new job. Seeing the League of Gentlemen was literally a dream come true as I've loved the League of Gentlemen since I was about 13, none of my friends liked it or even knew about it I think as my school friends always had a very different sense of humour to me. It actually influenced one of my final GCSE English coursework stories and the teacher asked what kind of TV etc. I watched as mine was so different to everyone else's. Basically it was quite dark and the character had a massive secret and plot twist at the end, very creepy, so I told her it was because I watched the LoG and all of their other works so much!
If anyone knows of any interesting plays going into the West End this year, let me know as I'm leaning more towards plays at the moment.
So here's what I have lined up this year so far:
2019:
February: Kinky Boots UK Tour
March: Rhod Gilbert, Les Miserables UK Tour, Panic! at the Disco
Hoping to see Six the Musical and Dear Evan Hansen this year!
Sorry for the wait, moving twice in one year and two new jobs was getting a bit overwhelming, but my Billy Elliot UK Tour post is very nearly done.
2018 was a very mixed year, my top three shows were the League of Gentlemen Tour, Hamilton and Everybody is Talking About Jamie, reviews of all shall be up soon now that I have moved again and started my new job. Seeing the League of Gentlemen was literally a dream come true as I've loved the League of Gentlemen since I was about 13, none of my friends liked it or even knew about it I think as my school friends always had a very different sense of humour to me. It actually influenced one of my final GCSE English coursework stories and the teacher asked what kind of TV etc. I watched as mine was so different to everyone else's. Basically it was quite dark and the character had a massive secret and plot twist at the end, very creepy, so I told her it was because I watched the LoG and all of their other works so much!
If anyone knows of any interesting plays going into the West End this year, let me know as I'm leaning more towards plays at the moment.
So here's what I have lined up this year so far:
2019:
February: Kinky Boots UK Tour
March: Rhod Gilbert, Les Miserables UK Tour, Panic! at the Disco
Hoping to see Six the Musical and Dear Evan Hansen this year!
Thursday, 12 January 2017
Ticket Touts update and Hamilton ticket thoughts
Hey everyone,
Just a quick update. We did email our MP Karen Bradley who is the Secretary of State for Culture, Sport and Media about the issue of ticket touts and the overpricing of tickets (which mentioned the day seats and lotteries which are good if you live near London or can afford to risk travelling down for the day, which most people can't due to travel costs etc.), companies like ticketmaster and how they deal with tickets and also the ridiculous fees that they charge, looking at you ATG (unless you get one of their stupid membership cards or can go to the theatre)!
Surprisingly, she wrote an actual reply completely on our side! She said that it they are pricing people out and it is not fair.
She has sent our letter to the Minister of State for Culture, Matthew Hancock MP so he can give us some comments and a full plan of action by his department on this issue. Therefore, I will update on here and twitter as soon as we get a reply!
In other news, anyone have any thoughts on the Hamilton tickets? Their way to tackle the touts sounds pretty good to be honest. I know it will be time consuming to get people in and it causes issues with buying tickets for people etc. which I raised to Karen Bradley as it happened with Benedict Cumberbatch's Hamlet, so hopefully we won't be stuck with that situation forever but I honestly can't think of a better solution at the moment until they start challenging these touts and putting rules or laws in place against them. Anyone got any ideas!
Pricing wise I am a bit disappointed as they did say they were going to keep it cheap. I know it is way less than Broadway, but we need to think about it as a West End show and compare it that way. If we do that then the tickets are a bit too expensive in my eyes, £200 is a lot of money for one ticket! For example, the top Les Mis premium is £127. Even their dearest normal tickets at £90 are more than other shows, so to use Les Mis again a show of a similar scale, their top normal ticket is £75. Les Mis was the most expensive tickets we have ever bought as it was for my Mum's birthday, which cost us £80 so this will top that if we get them! Book of Mormon, another one that came from Broadway helped to start pushing the prices up, so their top premium is £150 and top normal is £70, so Hamilton to me is still more expensive than is really fair. I don't like this trend of them pushing the prices up, which I mentioned to Karen Bradley as well and I can only see it doing more harm than good. Of course Hamilton will sell out for a while, as it is even cheaper for Americans to fly over and see it in London than over there, but other shows might struggle and I can even see Hamilton struggling once the novelty wears off a bit, as we see, even Wicked rarely sells out now even and it could harm other shows that put their prices up. I think this did Jersey Boys in at the end as I would love to have seen it more times, but the prices just didn't reflect what I was willing to pay anymore to visit the theatre, especially mid-week. They are doing like £40 seats which is fine for some people, but if I am spending money on a proper day out, once in a life time probably experience, I'd rather have decent seats and there is the lottery thing which I already raised the issues with! I honestly thought they were going to be a bit fairer.
Any way, nothing we can do for now, just hope we do get to see it, I have been saving up, and hope it is amazing! It will be interesting to see how a British audience takes to it (or not?) compared to American ones and how long its run will be. Can't wait to find out who we have as King George III!
Just a quick update. We did email our MP Karen Bradley who is the Secretary of State for Culture, Sport and Media about the issue of ticket touts and the overpricing of tickets (which mentioned the day seats and lotteries which are good if you live near London or can afford to risk travelling down for the day, which most people can't due to travel costs etc.), companies like ticketmaster and how they deal with tickets and also the ridiculous fees that they charge, looking at you ATG (unless you get one of their stupid membership cards or can go to the theatre)!
Surprisingly, she wrote an actual reply completely on our side! She said that it they are pricing people out and it is not fair.
She has sent our letter to the Minister of State for Culture, Matthew Hancock MP so he can give us some comments and a full plan of action by his department on this issue. Therefore, I will update on here and twitter as soon as we get a reply!
In other news, anyone have any thoughts on the Hamilton tickets? Their way to tackle the touts sounds pretty good to be honest. I know it will be time consuming to get people in and it causes issues with buying tickets for people etc. which I raised to Karen Bradley as it happened with Benedict Cumberbatch's Hamlet, so hopefully we won't be stuck with that situation forever but I honestly can't think of a better solution at the moment until they start challenging these touts and putting rules or laws in place against them. Anyone got any ideas!
Pricing wise I am a bit disappointed as they did say they were going to keep it cheap. I know it is way less than Broadway, but we need to think about it as a West End show and compare it that way. If we do that then the tickets are a bit too expensive in my eyes, £200 is a lot of money for one ticket! For example, the top Les Mis premium is £127. Even their dearest normal tickets at £90 are more than other shows, so to use Les Mis again a show of a similar scale, their top normal ticket is £75. Les Mis was the most expensive tickets we have ever bought as it was for my Mum's birthday, which cost us £80 so this will top that if we get them! Book of Mormon, another one that came from Broadway helped to start pushing the prices up, so their top premium is £150 and top normal is £70, so Hamilton to me is still more expensive than is really fair. I don't like this trend of them pushing the prices up, which I mentioned to Karen Bradley as well and I can only see it doing more harm than good. Of course Hamilton will sell out for a while, as it is even cheaper for Americans to fly over and see it in London than over there, but other shows might struggle and I can even see Hamilton struggling once the novelty wears off a bit, as we see, even Wicked rarely sells out now even and it could harm other shows that put their prices up. I think this did Jersey Boys in at the end as I would love to have seen it more times, but the prices just didn't reflect what I was willing to pay anymore to visit the theatre, especially mid-week. They are doing like £40 seats which is fine for some people, but if I am spending money on a proper day out, once in a life time probably experience, I'd rather have decent seats and there is the lottery thing which I already raised the issues with! I honestly thought they were going to be a bit fairer.
Any way, nothing we can do for now, just hope we do get to see it, I have been saving up, and hope it is amazing! It will be interesting to see how a British audience takes to it (or not?) compared to American ones and how long its run will be. Can't wait to find out who we have as King George III!
Friday, 6 January 2017
2016 Show list
Thought I'd put a quick list of the shows I saw in 2016 for future reference if nothing else, so it includes everything, not just plays and musicals. They are in no particular order, just how they popped into my head! If I've forgotten anything and remember later I'll edit the post and add it!
- Billy Elliot UK Tour
- Hairspray UK Tour
- Chicago UK Tour
- The Comedy About A Bank Robbery (twice!)
- Matilda
- In the Heights
- Panic! At the Disco
- Pentatonix
- Josh Widdicombe
- Nina Conti
- York Minister Mystery Plays
- The Commitments UK Tour
- Let Me Entertain You- Angela Beardmore's School of Dance
Things we already have lined up for 2017 are:
- Anton and Erin
- Hamlet at the Almeida Theatre (never been before!)
- The Play That Goes Wrong UK Tour
- Jon Richardson
- The Boys in the Band
We are currently thinking about what to see in August 2017, so far we have been thinking about
- Dream Girls
- School of Rock
- Motown
- We would like a play as well but will look closer to when things get announced!
If anyone knows of any good musicals/plays coming up, in August 2017 or before, let me know and I'll check it out. We are thinking about Sister Act UK Tour if I find time to go down to the theatre to avoid ATG's ridiculous booking/transaction fees! Otherwise I am planning a meet up with mates in February to either see a play or Jersey Boys one last time :(. After that, as things pop up I'll be booking more, I know Grease is on a UK Tour, which is my favorite musical but the cast looks terrible + ATG's are putting me off at the moment. We will probably be after Hamilton tickets too as soon as they say what dates they are selling too!
Happy New Year to everyone!
Wednesday, 16 November 2016
Post coming about ticket touts
I just had a thought that I might do a post soon about ticket touts as they are currently in the news here in the UK. There as select committee yesterday from the culture department with Ticketmaster and StubHub and the MPs don't seem very happy with their answers!
This will now get reported back to Karen Bradley who is the Culture Secretary and happens to be my MP. Therefore, I am currently writing a letter to her with some friends, my sister and her friends about our experiences, opinions and our wishes that she should be doing something about it. If we get a response I'll post some of it on her.
For now, here's an article from a UK newspaper about the current situation: https://www.theguardian.com/money/2016/nov/15/stubhub-ticketmaster-mps-touts-teckets
Let me know your thoughts/experiences of this and these idiots!
This will now get reported back to Karen Bradley who is the Culture Secretary and happens to be my MP. Therefore, I am currently writing a letter to her with some friends, my sister and her friends about our experiences, opinions and our wishes that she should be doing something about it. If we get a response I'll post some of it on her.
For now, here's an article from a UK newspaper about the current situation: https://www.theguardian.com/money/2016/nov/15/stubhub-ticketmaster-mps-touts-teckets
Let me know your thoughts/experiences of this and these idiots!
Sunday, 13 November 2016
Everyone's a crook! The Comedy About A Bank Robbery
We saw The Comedy About A Bank Robbery on the 3rd September at the Criterion Theatre. We had Ellie Morris on as Caprice and Steven Rostance on as Officer Shuck. The rest of the original cast was on. We sat in the middle of row D in the stalls.
I then saw it again on the 6th November (sitting just a row in front slightly to the left so my view was virtually the same) and we had we think Gareth Tempest on as Warren (sorry if this is wrong, I didn't properly check the cast board as I usually do as I was with my friends and trying to keep track of them!). The rest of the original cast was on though again. I felt I enjoyed it more the second time as although I knew where some of the jokes were coming or what was going to be said, I wasn't trying as much to learn characters/follow the story so could just enjoy the comedy and I had forgotten where a lot of the funny moments were anyway. So this one is well worth multiple visits. The theatre is pretty cool as well as it is right in the middle of Piccadilly Circus and is underground which is different. There is lots of tiles on the walls leading down to the auditorium which has composers names on if you are interested and want to try and spot your favorites!
Here's the trailer which shows some of the slapstick and musical numbers pretty well: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vEbjC7P4CH4
And here's the clip from TV which shows part of the scene done on wires: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0CQC0ki8BpY
First of all, let me tell you that I think this is one of the best things I have ever seen and has quickly become a favourite of mine as you can probably tell. I will definitely be going again and my sister wants to go again soon too anyway as do my mates after they have been to the other Mischief Theatre productions! I wanted to go again asap with my friends to show them the original cast before they leave and that was literally the only weekend we were free before January when I was told is about the time they are leaving! We are going to see Jersey Boys before that closes in March around January time so I had to leave that month free to see that and due to cost/travel etc. I can only afford to see one London one every few months or so. (I'm saving up for Hamilton as well so those in the know will know how expensive those tickets could potentially be!)
I think I should explain a little about the company who created this play first off in case people don't know. So, it is a play by a company called Mischief Theatre, who also wrote The Play that Goes Wrong and Peter Pan Goes Wrong. I'll review those soon, after Peter Pan has been on the TV at Christmas (I'll do a quick post to remind people!) and The Play that Goes Wrong after I've seen the tour next year! Mischief Theatre were formed from a group of LAMDA graduates and from what I can gather specialise in improvisation, and have been to the Edinburgh Fringe Festival etc. and they have gained members over the years. It is headed up by Henry Lewis and Jonathan Sayer, who are two of the writers as well. The other writer is Henry Shields for these three productions. Many of the members are cast members in their shows (often at the same time or some are in one and others in another at certain points), and other cast members have other roles in the company as well such as Dave Hearn is head of press (if you email them he is the one who replies which was a nice surprise for me when I got a reply!). Anyway, here is their website with more info about them if anyone is interested: http://mischieftheatre.co.uk/ Their mix of comedy styles is fantastic and I'm pretty confident there is something in there for everyone. I have been with several different people now, we all have very different senses of humor (particularly my friends) and we have all laughed so hard at this play. There are influences in there from Monty Python, Blackadder, Faulty Towers etc., and seems to appeal to every generation. There's slapstick, play on words, things that become relevant later without you realising at first, fast back and forth conversation scenes, over the top reactions etc,, there really is something to match your sense of humor. I'm not really one to laugh out loud at things, but this made me all the way through, making you want to jump of your seat and had people crying with laughter. I've never seen my Mum cry from laughing so much or one of my mates who is usually very hard to please!
Here's a quick go at the plot without ruining too much I hope! It is set in the 1950s in Minneapolis, USA and mostly takes place in a bank run by Mr Freeboys. His daughter is Caprice who basically just goes around ripping men off for money. Her boyfriend is Mitch who is in jail when we first meet him. The prison guard there is Cooper who turns out to be his friend. At the bank we also have Warren who is technically still an intern despite how long he was worked there, Mr Freeboys nephew Roger is the security guard and Ruth is like the receptionist/secretary. Her son is Sam who ends up liking Caprice. Officer Shuck is there to supervise the bank and ends up going out with Ruth. The confusing character in the programme is Everyone Else, which literally does mean the actor in that role is playing everyone else, which includes Roger. Other characters of his include a robber, a prince, an old man and a German guy, as well as seagulls! Basically, the plot is that a high value diamond is being stored at Mr Freeboys bank and Mitch wants to steal it. Caprice and Cooper are part of the plan and through a series of events, so is Sam. I won't tell you what happens with the diamond in the end as that would ruin it big style!
With this one, I think I'll tell you about the best bits whilst describing the characters, numbers and sets etc. as that seems the easiest way to do it. Hope that is okay and I might use that format for plays now.
With this one, I think I'll tell you about the best bits whilst describing the characters, numbers and sets etc. as that seems the easiest way to do it. Hope that is okay and I might use that format for plays now.
So the main group from Mischief Theatre are currently in The Comedy About A Bank Robbery, which is why we decided to go this year to see them. I cannot fault any of the cast members I have seen, so will write my favourite things/parts about them. I'll go in the order they are in the programme below:
First is Henry Shields as Mitch who is what would be classed as the villain in the story. He is personally my favourtie as he is the one that was to put up with lots of the nonsense and my mates all say he is like me dealing with all of them! My favourite part of his is when he is dealing with Mr Freeboys when they are putting their plan into motion at the bank and Mr Freeboys keeps getting annoyed with him, and also when they first meet, with all of the slapstick comedy between them. Him dealing with Cooper is also very funny, who was played by Greg Tannahill. My favourtie scene of his is when he is speaking to Mitch on a radio and there is a lot of fast paced word play dialogue. He becomes a very lovable character as he is constantly seeking Mitch's approval as his best friend and if he has done his job right, which he never has. These two work very well together in their scenes.
Next is Chris Leask as Everyone Else, he has so many roles but he plays them all brilliantly. My favourite part of his though is when is he playing a man, an old man and a German man, all of who Caprice is leading on. He does a brilliant scene where they are all arguing with each other and two are fighting and he has to switch between them all. This is so funny to watch and you cannot help but appreciate the difficulty of that. Nancy Wallinger (now Zamit) played Ruth who seems to be the real one running the bank. The thing that stood out for us about her was her voice. As I shall talk about later, there are musical numbers and she leads a few of them. We were not expecting her to be able to sing as well as she does as it is not a musical but she is a phenomenal singer. She is probably the strongest female character and my favourite scenes of hers were when she was dealing with the men, especially how she deals with a robber, she is one cool lady!
Henry Lewis played Mr Freeboys and he was most of my mates favourite due to his brilliant ability to get very angry! He does that a few times, where he gets very angry and then immediately back to being professional and trying to cope with the idiots around him. My favorite scene of his is his breakdown in the bank when a reporter arrives. Jonathan Sayer was Warren Slax and I think that the best part of this role is the slapstick routines he has to deal with and Jonathan performs them brilliantly. The understudy we had for this part in November was just as good to be honest, but you could possibly tell more that Jonathan was used to the role more and interacting with the other actors more as his performance flowed a bit better, especially a scene involving wires, a wall and a ladder. Everyone ends up loving this character though and feels a bit sorry for him.
Dave Hearn played Sam, who was my sister's favourite. My favourite scene of his an unexpected game of charades with Caprice when they are pretending to be Mr Freeboys to Mitch. He is brilliant at the very fast paced scenes, as well as the physical comedy elements on the wires for example. His facial expressions, especially his eyes, are very funny. Charlie Russel was Caprice in November and was very funny, again especially in the fast paces scenes with Sam and Mitch. My favourite scene of hers though is on the wires when stealing the diamond and she sings to keep the guard asleep (see YouTube clip linked above). The understudy we had in September for this role was equally as strong in the role though. Again, Caprice is definitely not a lady to be messed with. Finally, Jeremy Lloyd played Officer Shuck who is more of a side character, but still very funny. His best scene is when Mr Freeboys is/is not after a key and we see him have a complete breakdown eventually over the chaos. Again, the understudy we had in September was just as good.
As I mentioned earlier, there are musical numbers too! We were singing along before it even started to the music playing in the auditorium, my sister as a 13 year old was getting some looks that she knew all the lyrics, entirely my fault as I love 1950s music so she will have heard me listening to it and playing it! My mates knew less but couldn't resist singing along to 'Rockin' Robin' and 'Little Bitty Pretty' one which we all knew from the Matilda film. However, the musical numbers in the show are 'Come Softly to me', 'Dynamite', 'The Great Pretender', 'Why don't you do right' and 'Something's Got A Hold On Me' if you fancy a listen to the originals. Their version of 'Dynamite' is featured in the trailer linked above which I think was my favorite. They are sung for a little bit like a concert and then intertwined into the play, such as one becomes part of the Church scene or the cast are still singing them, popping up behind the set as the play is moving on. A funny part is when they are singing with telephone stands and using them as guitars. They are all sung acapella which is pretty impressive. Greg Tannahill and Nancy Wallinger (now Zamit) mostly led these, I think Johnathan Sayer led one, but Greg and Nancy's voices stand out during the songs, especially Nancy. As I said before the songs that she led completely blew us away. My Mum turned to look at me and we both mouthed 'wow'. We weren't expecting it first off because we didn't know they would be singing live as much as they did, but then she was as good, if not better than lots of the performers we have seen in the big West End musicals. Try and catch her in it just to hear her perform those songs if nothing else.
The set is another thing that stands out for this play. Lots of it is pretty standard, but there are a few key features essential to the play. The first is the fold up bed, which as you would expect, causes some characters a few issues. Another is the air vents above the stage. Lots of the work on wires happens from them and it is quite fun to have to look up to the ceiling to watch the cast and have them virtually on top of you! Therefore, I wouldn't sit on the front row as this part might be quite tricky or uncomfortable to watch. The other comes from a scene where you are supposed to be seeing it from the point of view of the character in the air vents, so you are looking down at the bank office floor. Therefore, two of the characters in the banks are on wires sitting on chairs behind desks that are actually on the back wall of the stage. It is very difficult to explain! It is confusing when you first see it as well and takes a bit of getting used to. Lots of laughs come from this scene with things dropping, characters trying to move around on the wall and things appearing to defy the laws of gravity and physics! I think along with the charade scene, this is my favourite. Back to seating, if you sit on the end of aisles you might miss a few things that happen through a window or door at certain points, but it isn't too much of a problem.
Shout out to the lighting which is fun to watch at points, especially when they are doing the car/bike chases, which is also a clever use of props, such as torches in a laundry trolley becoming a car or a desk chair becoming a motorbike. All of this is created by the cast members too with minimal props which is something quite unique in shows today. The costumes are 1950s office style so nothing really flashy, but they don't need to be in this play and they all work well together. This show also had no sound issues or issues with special effects which has happened a few times at other shows. There are loud gun shots if people are a bit nervous of them but most of the time you can prepare yourself. My sister jumps at everything and didn't fail to do so in this!
We had one "blooper" in September when Sam's glasses flew of the stage and Dave who plays Sam tried and failed to catch them. They were then passed back through the audience onto the stage and he broke character to shake the guys hand and stopped the play for a moment. Henry Shields was on the stage at this point as well and when Dave returned to his spot opposite him he replied with "what the heck was that" to which Dave replied with "my guardian angel" and then along with Ellie who was also on stage had a little laugh out of character for a moment. I personally love things like that as they are unique to that audience and remind you it is live theatre and they are real people up there and they can't just do another take like on TV! It gives you a funny memory as well.
The only thing I noticed that was different from September to November was that when a seagull died (odd I know but it makes sense once you've seen it!) he was placed into a medical box, which then is needed towards the end of the play so when it is opened, guess what's inside instead of what they need! I don't know if it has been taken about for good or what, let me know if you've seen it recently if that was in it or not.
One last thing to mention is the programme, most of these are usually pretty standard and boring but this one has a few extras in it. You get a history of the company and also a mock newspaper. It makes no sense what so ever before the play, but after it virtually every story/advert is related to the play and is funny. There's also a nod to the Play That Goes Wrong in there! So thanks for that, it kept us entertained on the train home!
Overall, this play is clever and very very funny. The cast members all bring their own talents to the characters and I think with this group it especially works very well as they play off each other brilliantly and you can tell they are having a great time as well. The characters and script alone are excellent though, so when the original cast leaves I can't see it getting any less funny. It is a great feel good, relaxed night at the theatre, nothing serious where you can go and forget about any stresses in your life and have a good laugh. It is suitable for anyone I think, (it's recommended for kids 11+ for a few little hints to things) but my family all enjoyed it as did my friends and as I said we all have very different senses of humor and it is very difficult to find something that we all enjoy. I can't recommend seeing this play enough. It is unusual for me to recommended things to my friends as I get a bit embarrassed telling them what I've enjoyed at the theatre, even though they know I'm a theatre nerd, but I could't resist with this one and somehow knew they would love it and we would have a great time together. They now what to see the other productions by Mischief Theatre so I need to get onto that. I'm watching Peter Pan Goes Wrong with one of them at least at Christmas so I think we will probably see that live next year now.
Anyway, I hope you take a trip to see this show and have a great time!
Outside of the Criterion Theatre |
Saturday, 30 April 2016
Quick update
Hi everyone,
Just a quick message to let you know that more reviews will be coming up once I've finished uni on the 18th May!
I've now seen Chicago and will be seeing Hairspray on the 13th, so will do both of them asap!
Sorry for the long wait but uni work, applying for masters and jobs has taken over my life at the moment!
Sophie
Just a quick message to let you know that more reviews will be coming up once I've finished uni on the 18th May!
I've now seen Chicago and will be seeing Hairspray on the 13th, so will do both of them asap!
Sorry for the long wait but uni work, applying for masters and jobs has taken over my life at the moment!
Sophie
Wednesday, 17 February 2016
V & A theatre and performance gallery
I was talking to some people on Facebook recently who wanted to know about the theatre exhibition at the V & A Museum. I went in late August so it was relatively fresh in my mind still and I offered some comments on it. It got me thinking that it is quite relevant to this blog so I thought I'd do a quick post about what it is.
I know there is a new exhibition now to celebrate the Olivier awards so this will have lots more things in it to do with theatre. However, it isn't permanent so I imagine they will change it back to being more like the one I saw and am writing about today when it finishes. I would love to go to the new one but I don't think I'll make it. If anyone does go let me know what it's like! Here's the link to to the new one, so get there if you can! https://shop.vam.ac.uk/whatson/index/view/id/1045/event/Curtain-Up--Celebrating-40-Years-of-Theatre-in-London-and-New-York/dt/2016-02-09/eType/1/free/1
The one I am talking about now though is their regular theatre and performance collection which is a long term gallery. Here's the link to the theatre and performance section on their website, it has some interesting information on it and some links to archives if you are doing research on anything. http://www.vam.ac.uk/page/t/theatre-and-performance/
The gallery was really good, I didn't really know what to expect as I didn't know anyone who had been before. I only accidentally came across it when I was on their website looking what was there, to see if it was worth my Mum and me visiting it whilst my sister and Dad went to the Science Museum across the road that I wasn't bothered about seeing. I'm glad I found it as I enjoyed it and so did my Mum. To be honest, even if your family and/or friends are not big theatre lovers I think that they would probably still enjoy it as there is so much stuff there and it covers a wide range of things. There are lots of unusual items as well which I don't think you could find anywhere else so that keeps people's interests up.
Here's a list of some of my favourite items:
I know there is a new exhibition now to celebrate the Olivier awards so this will have lots more things in it to do with theatre. However, it isn't permanent so I imagine they will change it back to being more like the one I saw and am writing about today when it finishes. I would love to go to the new one but I don't think I'll make it. If anyone does go let me know what it's like! Here's the link to to the new one, so get there if you can! https://shop.vam.ac.uk/whatson/index/view/id/1045/event/Curtain-Up--Celebrating-40-Years-of-Theatre-in-London-and-New-York/dt/2016-02-09/eType/1/free/1
The one I am talking about now though is their regular theatre and performance collection which is a long term gallery. Here's the link to the theatre and performance section on their website, it has some interesting information on it and some links to archives if you are doing research on anything. http://www.vam.ac.uk/page/t/theatre-and-performance/
The gallery was really good, I didn't really know what to expect as I didn't know anyone who had been before. I only accidentally came across it when I was on their website looking what was there, to see if it was worth my Mum and me visiting it whilst my sister and Dad went to the Science Museum across the road that I wasn't bothered about seeing. I'm glad I found it as I enjoyed it and so did my Mum. To be honest, even if your family and/or friends are not big theatre lovers I think that they would probably still enjoy it as there is so much stuff there and it covers a wide range of things. There are lots of unusual items as well which I don't think you could find anywhere else so that keeps people's interests up.
Here's a list of some of my favourite items:
- Fred and Ginger's outfits
- Lion King costumes
- War Horse puppet
- Recreation of Kylie's dressing room (this was my Mum's favorite as she loves Kylie and had only been to see her for the 1st time in April last year)
- Laurence Olivier's Oedipus costume
- Adam Ant's Price Charming outfit
- Original flying harness from Peter Pan (my favorite childhood story and film!)
As you can see there is a wide range of things, so probably something for all of the family to enjoy! It does take quite a long time to get around, it doesn't look that big even you walk in, but if you want to take in everything and look carefully at things as well as get good photos and read all of the information, you do need over an hour really. The V & A itself is huge and we only really had time to see that gallery and one of the main big galleries (I can't remember which one but it has lots of columns and gates in it as well as a religious items section and you can look down on it from the second floor) which was incredible to see, especially how big some of the items are, it left me wondering how they transported things!
I would thoroughly recommend a visit, especially as theatre fans, as some of the items are really special to see. The only thing I didn't really like was some of the panto costumes as they are a bit creepy looking, try and spot the evil looking chicken photobombing one of my nice photos below!
Here's some shots from one of the big main galleries, I don't think they really show the size and scale of some of the items though. My Mum is in most of the photos I took in this room so I won't put them up as she doesn't want me to, but the other people in the photos do sort of show the size of them well I guess. I don't know the names of these items but when I get home I'll see if I can find them in the mini guide/map they gave us, I just know it was in the gallery as soon as you come in through the door facing the main road, not the one opposite the Science Museum.
Here are the photos from the Theatre and Performance Gallery, look out for the evil chicken!
(Sorry if some are blurry the camera was messing about a bit and wasn't working great with the glass the items were behind).
Kylie's dressing room |
Mick Jagger's outfit |
Adam Ant's Price Charming outfit |
Jimmy Page's outfit |
George Formby's Ukulele Banjo |
Elton John's outfit |
Fred and Ginger's outfits |
Lion King |
Lion King |
Maggie Smith's The Importance of Being Earnest costume |
War Horse's Joey and puppeteer costumes |
Original Peter Pan flying harness. I'm a bit of a Peter Pan nerd so that's why this one was included on here! |
Laurence Oliver's costume- personally I think they need to move this to the front a bit as it is one of the most famous items! |
Friday, 12 February 2016
Grease Live!
Hi everyone, it's Grease Live time!
I wrote a lot of this whilst watching it (in the many ad breaks!) and then I edited it and added to it today when I had a chance to think back about it and re-watch some of the songs on YouTube as well as reading some other people's thoughts. Annoyingly the Fox YouTube account has now blocked the videos of the songs from views in the UK (I'm assuming it's the same for everyone outside America) but thankfully some other people have uploaded some copies of them, obviously not as good quality, but at least we can watch them in the UK. Sorry it's like a week late but better late than never!
I did enjoy it overall as I think it was quite a unique experience and something different. I didn't watch The Sound of Music live properly when it was on over Christmas here in the UK as I was quite busy and it isn't one of my favourite musicals so I lost interest. Therefore, Grease Live was the first one of these kind of things I had properly watch so it was a new experience for me. I've heard they are doing Hairspray so that is something to look forward to.
I'll start with the cast as always. but I'll tie this in with the song performances this time. I did like most of the cast, there were a few odd decisions such as Boys II Men instead of one Teen Angel which was a real shame but I'll come back to this in a bit. Danny was played by Aaron Tveit who I knew from Les Mis and I think he did a good job of it. He didn't come across as annoying as some people playing Danny do and he performed all of the key songs well. I liked his version of 'Sandy' and you could tell he was having a great time in 'Greased Lightinin'' which was fun to watch. He led the T-birds well and always remained the dominant character in the group which is what Danny has to do. Julianne Hough played Sandy and again, she did a good job I think. She was your stereotypical Sandy, staying the non-dominant and innocent member of the group at the beginning and getting stronger towards the end. I enjoyed her version of 'Hopelessly devoted to you' and I think she performed well in all of the other songs.
Vanessa Hudgens must get credit for her performance as Rizzo hours after her father passed away. Her version of 'Worse things I could do' I felt was spot on. It is my favourite song in the show so I did have high expectations. I don't think that she was the best Rizzo I have seen as she didn't come across as powerful or as dominant as Riz is supposed to be. She didn't seen to be as mean as she has appeared in other versions I have seen and she is supposed to be the strongest female character and I felt she was out performed by other cast members a couple of times. I think it was hard for me to see her in this role as I grew up with her playing Gabriella who is the Sandy character in High School Musical so it was hard at first to see her as anything but the innocent character role. After a while I did get used to it and by the end, especially after her song, I did properly see her as Rizzo and a stronger female character. Carlos PenaVega as Kenickie was fine as well, at least he got to sing part of 'Greased Lightnin'' which he performed really well!
I knew that Carly Rae Jepsen was in it, but it took me ages to realise who she was playing! In the end it was Frenchy and I think that she was an excellent choice. She performed well in all of her songs, including the new one 'All I need is an Angel' which gave Frenchy her own song to sing which I think was a nice addition. She had a few dodging acting moments in 'Beauty School Drop Out', but she did play the nice Pink Lady well. Jan and the rest of the T birds were cast well as well, no real stand out performances for me, it was a shame they missed out 'Mooning' as that denied them a song, but overall they performed in the supporting roles well. My favourite performance of the night was from Keke Palmer as Marty, her version of 'Freddy My Love' was fantastic! I loved her voice and style and I liked the way they did it, starting in the bedroom and then onto the stage and back again. Here's the version:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ZH6WWlDmd0
I thought it was clever casting and something I had never seen done before, well done Keke!
I hated 'Beauty School Drop Out', it is probably my second favourite song live and those guys (Boyz II Men) ruined it. To begin with it was weird as it was more than one guy and they kept doing that annoying Christian Aguilera thing with their voices, taking the melody too far away from the original version, which was really annoying. As others have noticed they also did not perform the comical elements of the song at all! I have seen Jason Capewell as the Teen Angel so many times now and he is the perfect person for the role, an excellent singer and perfect comic timing. Boys II Men did not do this song any justice and overall their singing as just really off key. Some have suggested that Darren Criss should have played the role as he performed the song in Glee so well, and I think that possibly this could have been the perfect casting choice and they messed up a bit on this one.
An odd thing I found and didn't think I would be saying, but Blanche I think was the person that made me laugh the most. She stole all the scenes she was in and had great comic timing. Patty always makes me laugh and she didn't fail to do so in this again. It was great to see Didi Conn and Barry Pearl, Frenchy and Doody from the film, in there, and it's a shame none of the others were there, but it was nice to see those two there at least! Jessie J singing the opening was pretty cool as well as it set it up nicely by showing you back stage and she is such an amazing singer anyway!
Overall, most of the cast did a really good job, especially considering the pressure of it being live to so many people. A couple of casting errors but overall, they performed the iconic roles well and as the play went on it was easier to see them as the characters.
I think I have to address the thing that comes up the most, which is the age of the actors. Obviously, in the film they were all way older than high school age and you could tell, especially the guys such as Sonny! In the stage versions they are mostly in the late 20s/early 30s, I've seen a few casts that were mostly in there early 20s and to be honest I do prefer it that way as it makes it more believable and they have the right energy levels and looks to make it more believable. I think that some of them in Grease Live were a little too old, Danny, Kenickie and Sonny stand out but I can see why they chose those people. To be honest, it could have been an opportunity to allow some up and coming young actors and singers to shine which I think could have been a better option. However, I guess they wanted some famous names to guarantee people would watch it so I can see why they went for some of the people that they did.
I have seen people complaining about a few changes they made so here are my thoughts on some of the most common ones I have seen. They got rid of the line all couples must be boy girl and things like that to suit a more modern audience, it didn't really bother me or affect the story so I think they got away with it, they may have done it to some other lines as well but if they did I didn't notice and they obviously didn't affect the story. The bit with Eugene and the car was rather odd I have to admit! Also, they edited some of the lines in 'Greased Lightin'' such to dragon wagon, which some people seem a bit annoyed about because they think it changed the meaning of the song too much. However, some of the cast recordings I have listened to also do so this wasn't new to me. I can understand why they did it as it did air quite early in the US and it was only just after 9 when the song was on in the UK I think. However, I don't think many people would have noticed the original lines, even kids really, I think I was singing the original lyrics when I was like 7/8, my parents probably didn't notice and I had no idea what they meant until I listened to them more closely when I was in my teens! However, I don't think it was a big an issue as people were making it out to be and moaning that they changed the lyrics, it really didn't affect the show.
The set was brilliant and I still have no idea how they worked out how to design it and get people from one place to another so quickly or set new scenes up so well. There were a few sound issues but nothing drastic or as bad as they could have been. Apparently some people spotted that the camera angles we watched in the UK were different to those in the US in 'Born to Hand jive' and this was possibly because they covered up a mistake, but I haven't really analysed this! If anyone has compared the two, let me know! Some people liked how they broke the forth wall at the end and went on the cars to the carnival and others didn't. I personally didn't like it but I can see why they needed to do it and it reminded you of the scale of the event they had just pulled off! Showing some of the backstage bits in between scenes or at ad breaks was a bit annoying and they could have shown all of the footage after, but lots of people enjoyed it as they went along and it wasn't too much of an issue to be fair.
Overall, I did enjoy it and I'm glad I had a night off my uni work to watch it. I couldn't help but sing along and thankfully they didn't ruin it for me. I liked most of the songs, a couple were ruined, but mostly their versions were updated and really fun. I recommend that people give it a go, skip parts if you get bored but stick with it as there are a couple of show stoppers in there. I am looking forward to the next live musical on TV and I think I will be a regular viewer of these now. I'm pretty sure it's still available on the ITV player in the UK and I'm sure you can find it on similar platforms around the world. The soundtrack is now in Spotify and iTunes here in the UK so have a listen to that!
I have no idea which show I will be doing next so I can't tell you what is coming up soon! However, I have done a quick post about the V and A museum so look out for that very soon!
Tuesday, 2 February 2016
Can't take my eyes off you- Jersey Boys (sorry for the long wait!)
Sorry for the long wait! Uni life was getting a bit hectic, I had course rep things to be doing, presentations to get ready, essays to write and I was also part of a theatre festival which was fun but very hard work and I was working in a school for a uni placement! Well it's a new term now, things are still a bit mad and will be until April/May now so sorry if I get behind again. (I'm supposed to be writing an essay draft now but taking a break to do this!). However, in April/May I am going to see the touring productions of Hairspray and Chicago, so I'll wait until I've seen them before I review both of them. Grease Live will be next.
We are looking at shows to see in London in August time, so any recommendations would be good, if anything new is coming out (I've heard Finding Neverland and School of Rock are coming, but I have no idea when) that would be useful. If any interesting plays are lined up (with celebs or without, we would quite like to see Andrew Scott or Bertie Carvel in something!) that would be good as well. My sister will be 14 then so we have to take age limits into consideration sometimes, but she has been fine with other things in the past e.g. we didn't expect that much swearing in Billy Elliot a few years ago! The current favourite in our house to see is The Play that Goes Wrong after seeing it on the Royal Variety and Keep it in the Family. We are going to see The Commitments tour show so it won't be that one in London.
Anyway onto Jersey Boys, which is my favourite show other than my longstanding favourite of Grease, I have to stay loyal to Grease as it has been my favourite since I was about 7 and it's the first show I can remember seeing, but Jersey Boys is probably my favourite one that I've seen when I've been a bit older. It won a Tony for Best Musical in 2006 and then an Olivier in 2008 for Best New Musical which is thoroughly deserved!
We went to see it on the 16th October 2009 Prince Edward Theatre. We had the original cast for this performance and no understudies.
This show was my choice alone as it was my 16th birthday present and party in one. My sister was only about 9 so she couldn't go due to the swearing, violence etc. so just be aware of the age restrictions or advice on this one. I took my Mum even though my Dad was supposed to be the one who was coming as he is a fan of the Four Seasons, but my Mum changed her mind at the last minute and didn't want to see Lion King again with my sister, my Dad caved in and gave up his ticket. (I took him to see the film and he saw the tour version in 2014 so we have made up for it, almost.) I'm glad that she came as she really enjoyed it and it was the first time we had been out just by ourselves in a long time! She still says it is one of the best she has seen, only being beaten by Chicago which is her favourite show no matter who is in it or where we see it, and Les Mis with Alfie Boe in it.
This show was my choice alone as it was my 16th birthday present and party in one. My sister was only about 9 so she couldn't go due to the swearing, violence etc. so just be aware of the age restrictions or advice on this one. I took my Mum even though my Dad was supposed to be the one who was coming as he is a fan of the Four Seasons, but my Mum changed her mind at the last minute and didn't want to see Lion King again with my sister, my Dad caved in and gave up his ticket. (I took him to see the film and he saw the tour version in 2014 so we have made up for it, almost.) I'm glad that she came as she really enjoyed it and it was the first time we had been out just by ourselves in a long time! She still says it is one of the best she has seen, only being beaten by Chicago which is her favourite show no matter who is in it or where we see it, and Les Mis with Alfie Boe in it.
I will do my thoughts on the main show in London first and then add a few comments about the tour which I went to see in 2014 at the end. This one is slightly different, as to be honest I can't fault this musical, so it is more about my thoughts on things rather than a review this time! As always, any comments are appreciated, if you have a critique I'd love to know and I'll share my thoughts on it!
To get you into the mood, here's the performance by the original west end cast in 2008 (just under a year before I saw it in 2009) at the Royal Variety. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dQc1_bRga20
To get you into the mood, here's the performance by the original west end cast in 2008 (just under a year before I saw it in 2009) at the Royal Variety. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dQc1_bRga20
Here's a quick summary of the show. Basically it is a jukebox musical and you are following the rise to success (and ultimate breakup) of Frankie Valli and the Four Seasons. The main four members (as it changes through time) who you follow are Frankie Valli (lead singer), Bob Gaudio (voice and keys), whose idea the musical was and supervised all of the music, Nick Massi (voice and bass) and Tommy DeVito (voice and guitar). You see things such as how they met, the rehearsal process, their time in jail, money issues, song writing, family issues and their breakup. It finishes with them being inducted into the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame. Each member of the band takes a turn in narrating the show, therefore, each of them takes a 'season' (see pictures below). Other 'characters' include the producer Bob Crewe, who is an interesting man and also other popular bands from the time such as The Angels.
I'll start with the cast as that is what everyone always asks about first. We were lucky enough to see the original west end cast, which consisted of Ryan Molloy as Frankie, Philip Bulcock as Nick, Stephen Ashfield as Bob (who is currently in the Book of Mormon) and Glenn Carter as Tommy. I was so happy that we got to see the original cast as they were the ones that I had seen online and on the TV and I never usually get to see the original cast of a west end musical as they usually leave before I get to see it! Ryan was brilliant as Frankie, he was pitch perfect throughout and played all of Frankie's different ages really well. He shows his fighting spirit when he was younger, all the way to the hard times he had to face as a father. I was really impressed with his acting, as I think when they cast these types of musicals they need to focus on the voice, so I was surprised at how good he was. When it gets really sad it was one of the only times I did get caught up in the story of a musical. Glenn was scary as Tommy at times and did show his dominance over the other members of the group. He is good at the comedy and really makes you believe he is making the others uncomfortable at moments. The run up to and the actual moments of his downfall (the scene around the table) were brilliant and really had my hooked, this is such an intense scene and he did an amazing job of leading it. Stephen had a lot of pressure as Bob was/is involved in the running of the show, but as with the others he did a brilliant job. Along with Philip as Nick, these are the two members that you end up liking the most and feel for. Philip was particularly good at the comic moments (the towels moment sticks in my memory, if you've seen it you know what I mean, if you haven't I don't want to ruin it, but it is a particularly funny moment that also makes you feel really sorry for Nick). The best part of the cast is that they show the relationships between the characters really well and show how different they were between them all. Such as the tensions between Frankie and Tommy or the friendship that ends up strained between Nick and Tommy. The guys did a fantastic job and I can't fault them.
The rest of the cast were good as well, I liked Frankie's daughter (I'll check names when I get home) as she showed the strain Frankie's work put on his relationships with his family. The female singers were a welcome addition as I always like to see the women taking centre stage at some point even in this male focused musical and their songs are quite fun ones.
The music is what makes this musical. If you are a fan of Frankie Valli and the Four Seasons it is a must see, as is it if you are a fan of music of those eras. However, I didn't know lots of the music, just the really famous ones like Sherry, Oh What a Night etc. but it doesn't matter, the music grabs you immediately. The live band does a fantastic job of recreating the music as well as updating it a bit such as lots is done at a faster tempo, which means it is more upbeat and I guess they get through it faster. To be honest, I now prefer the musical versions due to their faster pace and probably because they are of a better sound recording. My favourite song is I Can't take my Eyes off you due to the build up to the chorus. I played it as a sax solo with a Big Band and loved playing that part. People do sing along (mostly elderly women on the tour who once people turned around and looked at firmly they quietened down a bit) which is a bit annoying so beware of annoying theatre goers, but the music from the stage is usually loud enough that you can effectively ignore them!
The set is not too elaborate which works well and is nice to see sometimes in contrast to something like Wicked or when I went to see Hamlet. It is very dark to reflect some of the locations I guess such as the prison or clubs. It works well and the props always make sure you know where you are, even the lighting such as a cross appears when they are in the Church. I like it when the band appear at points such as on the top balcony in Can't take my Eyes off you, as it reminds you that they are there and are an important part of the show. My favourite part of the set is when you are looking at the stage as though you are behind the band whilst they are on stage and you are getting a view of the audience which is done using a black screen with lights on. It's just nice to imagine what they were going through and the scale of what they were faced with at shows. Another fun point is when they are recording for a TV show and there is a live camera on stage filming them and it appears on the screen on stage, acting as a TV. They then panned to the live theatre audience and you became the studio audience and appeared on the TV which is quite a nice added bonus experience.
The costumes are all periodically accurate as far as I know, I'm not an expert in fashion history so I would have to check that there were no mistakes. They recreate lots of their famous outfits perfectly, obviously the red jackets, which are my favourite. Lots of dark colours are used, which I assume is what they would have been wearing, contrast well with the brighter outfits. The women's costumes obviously stand out the most as they are more colourful and elaborate, the best are probably the singers dresses. The hair is all well done as well and the female's styles really make you feel like you are in the eras. The costumes and hair are quite fun to watch as they show you the change in styles though the eras. The microphones also show this and it does remind you how long the band was working for. As a musician I couldn't help but admire the drum kits and guitars in particular, the change in styles is noticed here as well, but the range of colours and styles they use is nice to see too. I can't remember any technical issues which is always a bonus!
So that's the west end version, basically perfect in my eyes. If I missed anything or you would like to know more about anything drop me a message on here or Twitter @sophd221b and I'll answer as best as I can. :)
The rest of the cast were good as well, I liked Frankie's daughter (I'll check names when I get home) as she showed the strain Frankie's work put on his relationships with his family. The female singers were a welcome addition as I always like to see the women taking centre stage at some point even in this male focused musical and their songs are quite fun ones.
The music is what makes this musical. If you are a fan of Frankie Valli and the Four Seasons it is a must see, as is it if you are a fan of music of those eras. However, I didn't know lots of the music, just the really famous ones like Sherry, Oh What a Night etc. but it doesn't matter, the music grabs you immediately. The live band does a fantastic job of recreating the music as well as updating it a bit such as lots is done at a faster tempo, which means it is more upbeat and I guess they get through it faster. To be honest, I now prefer the musical versions due to their faster pace and probably because they are of a better sound recording. My favourite song is I Can't take my Eyes off you due to the build up to the chorus. I played it as a sax solo with a Big Band and loved playing that part. People do sing along (mostly elderly women on the tour who once people turned around and looked at firmly they quietened down a bit) which is a bit annoying so beware of annoying theatre goers, but the music from the stage is usually loud enough that you can effectively ignore them!
The set is not too elaborate which works well and is nice to see sometimes in contrast to something like Wicked or when I went to see Hamlet. It is very dark to reflect some of the locations I guess such as the prison or clubs. It works well and the props always make sure you know where you are, even the lighting such as a cross appears when they are in the Church. I like it when the band appear at points such as on the top balcony in Can't take my Eyes off you, as it reminds you that they are there and are an important part of the show. My favourite part of the set is when you are looking at the stage as though you are behind the band whilst they are on stage and you are getting a view of the audience which is done using a black screen with lights on. It's just nice to imagine what they were going through and the scale of what they were faced with at shows. Another fun point is when they are recording for a TV show and there is a live camera on stage filming them and it appears on the screen on stage, acting as a TV. They then panned to the live theatre audience and you became the studio audience and appeared on the TV which is quite a nice added bonus experience.
The costumes are all periodically accurate as far as I know, I'm not an expert in fashion history so I would have to check that there were no mistakes. They recreate lots of their famous outfits perfectly, obviously the red jackets, which are my favourite. Lots of dark colours are used, which I assume is what they would have been wearing, contrast well with the brighter outfits. The women's costumes obviously stand out the most as they are more colourful and elaborate, the best are probably the singers dresses. The hair is all well done as well and the female's styles really make you feel like you are in the eras. The costumes and hair are quite fun to watch as they show you the change in styles though the eras. The microphones also show this and it does remind you how long the band was working for. As a musician I couldn't help but admire the drum kits and guitars in particular, the change in styles is noticed here as well, but the range of colours and styles they use is nice to see too. I can't remember any technical issues which is always a bonus!
So that's the west end version, basically perfect in my eyes. If I missed anything or you would like to know more about anything drop me a message on here or Twitter @sophd221b and I'll answer as best as I can. :)
Glenn Carter as Tommy |
Stephen Ashfield as Bobby |
Philip Bulcock as Nick |
Ryan Molloy as Frankie |
We went to see it in Manchester as I was back at uni when it came to my local theatre in Stoke. I'm glad we went to see it there as it made it that little bit more special. I think we went in September 2014 (I'll get the date from my sister as soon as possibly as she has her ticket on her bedroom wall still), but I remember it being right by my 21st birthday as we said it was weird as the last time I had seen it was for my 16th birthday, so two of my special birthdays! We had the understudy Frankie, I think this is because we saw the Saturday matinee, but to be honest he was amazing. I think he sounded even more like Frankie than Ryan. I can't remember his name at the moment and I'm writing this from uni so I don't have the programme in front of me but I'll edit this post as soon as I get home and check and add the full cast list as I do like giving performers credit where it is due! I would ask my sister to check but my programmes are all in order and I know she will mess it up. The production was virtually the same, as good as I remember, with brilliant singers and band members. I can remember that the camera didn't show the audience when it panned around, which I assume is due to technical challenges but wasn't a big issue just a shame as it is quite a fun part of the show. All of the set was the same and costumes so it didn't really feel like you were missing out on anything by not seeing it in London, so well done to all involved!
Overall, this show is a must see. It is my favourite one (other than Grease) and I really can't fault it. Listening to the soundtrack always cheers me up and brings back fond memories. I loved seeing the original cast, but to be honest, I think I could see anybody in the roles and it would be hard to ruin it for me (unless the Frankie really couldn't sing then that would probably be a big issue!). I can't wait to see it again and will hopefully be going again in the next few years, especially as I've promised to take my Dad and my sister is now old enough to enjoy it as well and likes the music as well now. I'd love to see it on Broadway as America is their home nation and I would like to see if the production is different, I can only dream and wish for the moment though!
Some extras: original Broadway cast at the 2007 Tony awards: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LIJC_DgOGY8
The film version: I would recommend watching it but obviously it has been edited and made more dramatic for film purposes, but the original Broadway Frankie stars as Frankie and he is really good. Ryan sings in Beggin'. I did enjoy the film overall, the story and emotions still get me and I can't help singing along. I particularly liked Tommy as well in the film. Also me and my Dad went to see it on the last day of my first year at uni in York so it is extra special to me. Here's Oh what a night for you: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-U0awj_zUmU
To book tickets in London, here's the link: http://jerseyboyslondon.com/
UK Tour until March 2016: http://www.jerseyboysuktour.com/tour-dates/tour-tickets/
Broadway: http://www.jerseyboysinfo.com/broadway/
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)